The World Cup may bring millions of visitors to the US, but in host cities across the country, residents and housing advocates say the tournament already threatens to make a bad affordability crisis worse.
Reports indicate more than 10 million people could travel to the US for the event this summer, raising urgent questions about where those visitors will stay. Hotels remain under-booked in the 11 host cities, while short-term rental listings in some places have jumped by as much as 30% in recent weeks. Platforms such as Airbnb have pushed harder for new hosts, including with a reported $750 sign-up bonus, and some listings have already climbed to $6,000 a night.
“This is not a World Cup for the people,” residents and advocates argue as short-term rentals expand and affordability pressures mount.
That surge alarms organizers and affordable housing groups from Seattle to Atlanta. Their concern runs beyond tourist demand: they fear landlords and homeowners will shift more units into the short-term market, tightening supply for locals and driving rents higher. In cities where housing costs already strain working families, even a temporary rush can ripple far beyond the final match.
Key Facts
- More than 10 million visitors are expected to travel to the US for the World Cup this summer.
- Hotels remain under-booked across America’s 11 host cities, according to the report.
- Short-term rental listings in some cities have increased by as much as 30% in recent weeks.
- Some hosts have listed properties for as much as $6,000 per night, while Airbnb has offered a reported $750 sign-up bonus.
Advocates also warn that unhoused people could face even more pressure as cities prepare for the global spotlight. Sources suggest fears of displacement and sweeps have grown alongside the scramble to house visitors. For critics, the issue is not just price; it is who gets pushed aside when a major event collides with an already fragile housing market.
What happens next will test how far host cities will go to protect residents while chasing the economic upside of a global tournament. If officials fail to curb speculative short-term rentals or shield vulnerable tenants, the World Cup could leave behind a familiar legacy: a burst of visitor revenue, followed by deeper strain for the people who live there year-round.