The most iconic flourish in The Devil Wears Prada nearly vanished from the sequel before cameras could turn nostalgia into momentum.

Reports indicate The Devil Wears Prada 2 almost moved forward without a new fashion montage tied to Madonna’s “Vogue,” a striking near-miss for a franchise so closely linked to that song’s swagger and the original film’s makeover magic. In the 2006 movie, the track powered Andy’s transformation from overwhelmed outsider to polished Runway insider, locking music, fashion, and character into a scene audiences still remember instantly.

The sequel reportedly came close to dropping the very kind of sequence that helped make the original feel timeless.

That matters because The Devil Wears Prada never relied on clothes alone. Its cultural grip came from the way it turned fashion into narrative: every look sharpened Andy’s ambition, every styling choice raised the stakes of Miranda Priestly’s world. A new montage does more than echo a famous scene. It signals that the filmmakers understand what viewers actually carry with them from the first film — not just the brand names or the magazine gloss, but the velocity and seduction of reinvention.

Key Facts

  • Reports indicate The Devil Wears Prada 2 almost did not include a new “Vogue” fashion montage.
  • The original 2006 film used Madonna’s “Vogue” in Andy’s now-iconic style transformation sequence.
  • The franchise remains strongly associated with Vogue magazine and with Miranda Priestly’s connection to Anna Wintour.
  • The debate over the montage underscores how central that sequence remains to the film’s identity.

The decision also reveals the pressure that hangs over any sequel to a beloved hit. Lean too hard on callbacks, and the film risks feeling mechanical. Ignore them, and it can seem blind to its own legacy. Sources suggest this montage sat right at that fault line: a creative choice loaded with fan expectation, brand memory, and the challenge of updating a scene that once captured a very specific moment in pop culture.

What happens next will shape how audiences judge the sequel long before the full story lands. If the new montage works, it could bridge the original film’s sharp, aspirational energy with a fashion world that has changed dramatically since 2006. If it misses, viewers will notice just as quickly. Either way, this small creative battle points to the bigger truth about sequels now: survival depends less on repeating old magic than on knowing exactly why that magic mattered in the first place.