Britain’s broadcast regulator has reopened its fight with GB News, launching an investigation into a Donald Trump interview it had previously left alone.

Ofcom’s move centers on a sit-down from last November in which Trump reportedly told presenter Bev Turner that human-induced climate change was “a hoax.” The regulator had initially declined to investigate the segment, but it has now changed course. That reversal thrusts GB News back into a long-running clash with the watchdog over the channel’s editorial line and its handling of high-profile political content.

Ofcom’s decision signals that climate misinformation on a major broadcast outlet still carries regulatory risk, even months after it airs.

The case matters beyond a single interview. It tests how far a broadcaster can go when airing contested or false claims from powerful political figures, especially on subjects with broad public impact. Reports indicate the regulator will examine whether the program breached rules around due accuracy or materially misleading content, though the full scope of the probe may emerge only as the process unfolds.

Key Facts

  • Ofcom has decided to investigate GB News over a Donald Trump interview from last November.
  • The interview reportedly included Trump’s false claim that human-induced climate change is “a hoax.”
  • The regulator had first declined to pursue the case before reversing that decision.
  • The move adds to years of tension between Ofcom and GB News.

For GB News, the investigation adds pressure at a moment when regulators, broadcasters, and audiences all remain locked in a wider argument over free expression, political access, and factual standards on air. For Ofcom, the reversal also invites scrutiny of its own judgment: why the segment passed muster at first, and what changed enough to trigger formal action now. Sources suggest that broader concerns about misinformation and precedent may have pushed the issue back into view.

What happens next will matter well beyond one channel. Ofcom’s findings could shape how British broadcasters handle interviews with political figures who make disputed claims, particularly on climate and other high-stakes public issues. If the regulator draws a harder line, networks across the UK may need to rethink not just who they book, but how aggressively they challenge what gets said live or on tape.