A row over council tax has put the Green Party’s leader on the defensive after the party acknowledged he had been living on a London houseboat until recently and may not have paid what was due.

The issue cuts sharply because it touches on a basic test of political credibility: whether a party that campaigns on fairness and accountability can answer clear questions about its own leader’s finances. Reports indicate the party has admitted the living arrangement and that Polanski has apologised, but key details about the tax status of the houseboat and how long the situation lasted remain under scrutiny.

A routine local tax matter has become a credibility test for a party that asks voters to trust its judgment.

The case also highlights a murky corner of local taxation. Houseboats can fall into different categories depending on how they are used and where they are moored, and that can affect whether council tax applies. That complexity may shape the explanation, but it will not erase the political problem. Opponents will likely argue that leaders should settle any ambiguity before it turns into a public controversy.

Key Facts

  • The Green Party says its leader had been living on a houseboat in London until recently.
  • The party admits he may have failed to pay council tax.
  • Polanski has apologised over the issue.
  • Further details about liability and any repayment remain unclear from the initial reports.

What happens next matters beyond one apology. The pressure now falls on Polanski and the party to explain the timeline, clarify whether tax was owed, and show how any shortfall will be addressed. In a campaign environment that punishes inconsistency fast, even a local billing dispute can harden into a larger question about standards and leadership.