G. Robert Blakey, the legal strategist who shaped the federal RICO anti-racketeering statute and later steered a major congressional assassination inquiry, has died at 90.

Blakey left a mark on American law that reached far beyond courtrooms. Reports indicate he drafted the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, a statute that gave prosecutors a far more aggressive way to target organized crime and complex criminal networks. The law became a defining tool in the federal campaign against mob activity and other coordinated wrongdoing.

Key Facts

  • G. Robert Blakey died at age 90.
  • He drafted the federal RICO anti-racketeering statute.
  • He served as chief counsel to the House Select Committee on Assassinations in the late 1970s.
  • He spent years as a law professor at Notre Dame.

His career also moved straight into one of the most politically sensitive investigations of the era. In the late 1970s, Blakey served as chief counsel to the House Select Committee on Assassinations, placing him at the center of Congress’s effort to revisit some of the country’s most contested killings. That role cemented his reputation as a lawyer willing to work where criminal law, public trust, and national trauma collided.

Blakey’s career joined two powerful ideas: that law can dismantle entrenched criminal power, and that public institutions must keep pressing for answers in cases that refuse to fade.

He also spent years at Notre Dame as a law professor, helping shape generations of lawyers after his government service. That academic chapter mattered because it extended his influence beyond headline cases and landmark statutes. In classrooms and legal debates, he stood as a link between the creation of major federal policy and the teaching of how that policy works in practice.

Blakey’s death will likely renew debate over the reach of RICO, a law that has stretched far beyond its original organized-crime focus, and over the unfinished public fascination with the assassination investigations he helped lead. What comes next is less about a single obituary than about the endurance of his work: prosecutors, lawmakers, and legal scholars will keep arguing over the tools he built and the questions he pursued.